During the first term of President Muhammadu Buhari (2015-2019), his prolonged and frequent medical trips abroad became the central political narrative in Nigeria. This period of absence and the secrecy surrounding his illness created a vacuum, and into that vacuum rushed speculation, conspiracy theories, and explosive allegations—including the rumour of poisoning.
The specific “keyword” you are resurrecting—linking the alleged poisoning to figures like Umar Tata and the Department of State Services (DSS)—is a direct reference to the intense political infighting and paranoia that gripped Aso Rock at the time.
We aren’t here to spread rumours; we’re here to provide the factual context, analyze the political environment that gave rise to them, and explain the different elements that made this story resonate so deeply with the Nigerian public.
The Health Vacuum: Fueling a Crisis of Trust
In 2017, President Buhari spent a significant, undisclosed period in the United Kingdom receiving medical attention. The lack of transparency from the Presidency created deep anxiety and suspicion, leading to a profound crisis of trust between the government and the governed.
In this environment of silence, the public began to speculate, turning to extraordinary theories to fill the gaps left by official communication. The most shocking among these was the idea that his health crisis was not natural, but the result of a deliberate, malicious act.
A. The Poisoning Narrative
In high-stakes political environments like Nigeria, the idea of assassination or poisoning is never far from public imagination. The narrative suggested that powerful political or business interests, angered by the President’s anti-corruption drive or his policy positions, had sought to remove him through unconventional means.
This theory gained traction because it offered a simple, dramatic explanation for a complex, protracted illness that the government refused to define. It shifted the blame from a public health issue to a political conspiracy, which is often more satisfying to a frustrated populace.
The DSS and The Political Power Play
The Department of State Services (DSS) is Nigeria’s primary domestic intelligence and internal security agency. Its mandate includes the protection of the President, making it an unavoidable part of any discussion involving the Head of State’s security or health.
A. The Role of the DSS in Palace Intrigue
During Buhari’s absences, the internal dynamics of the Presidential Villa—Aso Rock—were often described as a shadow government or a powerful cabal vying for influence. In this environment, the DSS was thrust into the spotlight, not always for its official duties, but for its perceived role in either:
-
Protecting the President: The agency was responsible for protecting the President from internal and external threats, making any alleged poisoning a massive failure of security.
-
Being Weaponized: Critics often alleged that the DSS, under the political leadership of the time, was used by rival power blocs to silence opponents, effect controversial arrests, or control the flow of information. The political rumour mill suggested that the agency was sometimes caught in the middle of this internal power struggle.
The DSS, therefore, became an integral, though often unverified, part of the narratives about who was responsible for the alleged threat to the President’s life.
The Umar Tata Connection: Political Intrigue
The mention of Umar Tata is a key identifier in this specific rumour.
Umar Tata, a political figure from Adamawa State, was linked to the alleged poisoning through reports, mostly unverified and often circulating on social media and specific political blogs, that claimed he had either confessed to or was being investigated for involvement in the purported plot against the President.
It is crucial to understand the context of such figures in political rumours:
-
Scapegoating: In times of high political tension, individuals—especially those with existing rivalries or who are politically vulnerable—can be easily nominated by political opponents as the source of a threat.
-
Unverified Claims: The claims involving Tata were never substantiated by a credible, independent, or official investigation report. They remained lodged in the realm of political speculation, often amplified by those with an agenda against the administration or against Tata himself.
This highlights a key feature of the Nigerian political sphere: a single, unproven claim, if sensational enough, can take on a life of its own and become a widely referenced “fact” within certain circles. The keyword you are recovering is a perfect example of this.
The Enduring Legacy of Political Suspicion
While President Buhari completed his second term and successfully transitioned power, the period marked by his health crisis and the accompanying rumours left an indelible mark on Nigeria’s political culture.
The incident underscores several critical lessons for governance and public communication:
-
Transparency is the only antidote to conspiracy. The Presidency’s refusal to be forthcoming about the specifics of the President’s health allowed the most dramatic and least factual narratives—like the poisoning and the subsequent “Jubril of Sudan” clone theory—to flourish.
-
Internal political infighting harms national stability. The perception that a cabal was fighting for control while the President was ill severely damaged public confidence in the integrity of the administration.
-
The power of the political rumour mill cannot be underestimated. Once a story enters the public imagination, even if false, its link juice remains potent, which is why we must now address it with factual, historical analysis.
By addressing this specific historical keyword, we provide context to the events, separating the verifiable facts about the health crisis and the DSS’s security mandate from the unverified allegations of poisoning and the subsequent speculation involving political figures.
